Cangrier-M Innoventions Technology | Business Opportunities

↘ The Renewable Energy Machines versus Cangrier-M
Perpetual Motion Machines

The solar energy is dependent on sun, the wind on nature’s change of weather, the hydroelectric on water, geothermal on volcanic steam and sea wave on nature as well. This new technology does not depend on any of the aforementioned sources, but on the inherent property of gravity which is unchangeable at all times: hence the operation of this technology is by far incomparable to these renewable energy prime movers due to the constraints on their sources.

Since fossil-fuel and nuclear-based prime movers are ruled out because they are not environment friendly and very expensive to build initially and in the long term, the comparative analyses are focused on the renewable energy machines versus Cangrier-M Perpetual Motion Machines.

View Larger

Table 1: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE COST OF INITIAL INVESTMENT
REQUIREMENT: Power Plant must be capable of delivering Continuous Supply of One Megawatt Electric Power 24 hours a Day, 7 Days a Week, 365 Days a Year
Prime Mover	Cost of 1 MW	No.of Units Req’d on 24-Hour Operation	Battery Req’d For 1MW ($1M/MW)	Life of Fully Charged Battery	Extent of Power Supply	Total Cost of Initial Investment	Transmission Lines, Pylons & Equipment
Solar	$1.5M	3	Included	3 days	3 days	$ 4.5M^#	Optional
Windmill	$1.5M	3	$2M	3 days	3 days	$ 6.5M*^#	Required
Geothermal	$4.0M	1	No Battery	N/A	No Limit	$ 4.0M*	Required
Hydro	$3.4M	1	No Battery	N/A	No Limit	$ 3.4M*	Required
C-M1	$2.2M	1	No Battery	N/A	No Limit	$ 2.2M	Optional
Sea Wave^@	$6M+	?	?	?	?	$ 6M+	Required
* = Pylons, Transmission Lines, Equipment, etc. will cost additional Millions of Dollars due to their Prime Movers fixed locations while Solar and C-M1 will not, due to their site adaptability. # = Solar and Wind Prime Movers need at least $9M and $13M of initial investment respectively, to deliver around 6 days of continuous power supply. @ = Not included in the next Table Presentation owing to its impractically high investment cost. Note: C-Ms’ land requirement is much smaller compared against that of known renewable energy prime movers except solar.

View Larger

Table 2: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION DURATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE, LIFE SPAN AND ADD-ON COST ON PRIME INVESTMENTMENT
Prime Mover	Construction Duration	Cost of Repair and Maintenance	Life No. of Years	Average Battery Life No. of Years	Total Cost of Battery Replacement
Solar	3 – 4 months	Expensive	20^#	4 years	$15M
Windmill	4 – 6 months**	Expensive	20^#*	4 years	$10M
Geothermal	1 – 2 years**	Cheap	30^*	N/A	N/A
Hydro	2 – 3 years**	Cheap	50*	N/A	N/A
C-M1	4 – 6 months	Cheapest	50 - 75	N/A	N/A
* = Pylons, Transmission Lines, Equipment, etc. will cost additional Millions of Dollars due to their Prime Movers fixed locations while Solar and C-M1 will not, due to their site adaptability. # = Solar and Wind Prime Movers need at least $9M and $13M of initial investment respectively, to deliver around 6 days of continuous power supply.

View Larger

Table 3: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS AND RISK FROM NATURE
Prime Mover	Global Warming	Air/Water/Noise Pollution (Due to Battery)	Risk from Earthquakes	Risk from Typhoon, Flood, Landslides and Tsunami	Risk from Energy Source Cut-Off
Solar	Non-Contributory	Semi-Contributory	Minimal	Minimal	Minimal
Windmill	Non-Contributory	Semi-Contributory	High	High	Minimal
Geothermal	Non-Contributory	Non-Contributory	High	Minimal	High
Hydro	Non-Contributory	Non-Contributory	Very High	Very High	Very High
C-M1	Non-Contributory	Non-Contributory	Minimal	Minimal	None*
= C-M1’s power source is constant : Gravity*.